“Discussion” was a slippery term. Panels happened — a historian arguing about the ethics of archive-looting, a developer defending algorithms that learned to lie, a poet reading a manifesto in three languages at once — but the substance of the forum lived in the liminal moments. Masha's interventions were always brief and absurdly precise. She would step up, tilt her head, and say nothing for a beat long enough to make you question whether you had stopped breathing. Then she’d ask: “What if our cities remembered us the way we remember them?” She never answered. That was the hook.
There were performances too — not the polished, curated kind but experiments that felt dangerous precisely because they might go wrong. A performance artist attached a glass jar to the spout of the public fountain and invited people to return a handful of coins to the city, not as donation but as apology. A musician tuned a violin to the pitch of conversation and played, not notes, but the gaps between sentences; the piece sounded like a crowd breathing at once. Chan Forum Masha Babko
People left the building in different phases: some glowing with the high lightness of newly minted ideologies, some tired and cross because their worldview had been dented slightly, and a few privately furious at having to feel seen. The river that ran by the printing house reflected faces in waves, and later that week, some of those faces would appear in op-eds, in grant applications, in spreadsheets. Others would become a story passed on in late-night conversations. The forum itself, like any good rumor, would grow teeth and tails as it traveled. “Discussion” was a slippery term
Workshops were written in present tense: “Build a Resistance,” “How to Host a Rumor,” “Repairing Public Memory.” People left these rooms either inspired to dismantle a system or to fix the coffee machine outside. In the “How to Host a Rumor” workshop, Masha demonstrated the anatomy of a whisper: it needs a credible half-truth, a willing co-conspirator, and a destination. She taught rumor like a craftsperson teaches knots — with hands and quietly inflected metaphors. The students left feeling clever and slightly dangerous. She would step up, tilt her head, and
At the back of the room, a cluster of teenagers traded memes that aged like nicotine stains. Near the front, a woman in a suit kept scribbling corrections into a notebook with the exact fury of someone drafting a will. A man with a beard and a camera kept photographing the same set of empty chairs as if some ancient ritual required it. The faces at Chan Forum Masha Babko were portraits of contemporary attention — restless, compulsive, earnest in the smallest way and merciless in the largest.
Not all reactions were warm. A contingent of journalists hovered like falcons, hungry for quotable lines and scandal. They found a half-formed argument about urban surveillance and polished it into a headline about “privacy sabotage.” The forum bristled: people misunderstood the nuance of manufactured outrages, they loathed the flattening lens of public story-telling. Yet even the journalists left murmuring, not with definitive scoops, but with a stack of questions that would bleed into the week’s columns and podcasts.
The forum’s less formal rituals were just as reliable. At noon, everyone pretended to ignore the sky but kept exchanging weather metaphors as political critiques. After the last formal talk, a procession would snake out toward the river. Someone always began an argument about gentrification, someone else would insist that art had nothing to do with politics, and Masha would walk between them like a seamstress checking stitches. Once, a man shouted that online spaces had ruined privacy; a teenager replied that “privacy was a class you don’t get if you can’t afford to be boring.” They left equally unpersuaded and strangely satisfied.
